I’m reading an article on the Hellenistic pillar figurines from Maresha, Lachish, Tel H̱alif and Beit She’an, which are a continuation of the Judean pillar figurines. Since these are found primarily in areas where Dionysos had a strong cultic presence (and throughout the Greek world he had similar hermai erected in his honor) it is not surprising that a lot of these figurines represent him. So many that he’s got a whole category, with sub-types. What is surprising is that one of those sub-types is transgender, usually consisting of a male head with ivy crown and tainia, and female breasts.
Now, of course, Dionysos is a Queer God, as I’ve written about here as well as numerous other places. However I cannot help but wonder if the scholars forgot to ask a couple important questions. These figurines were manufactured locally, for a local audience (consisting of Hellenes, Makedonians, and later Romans as well as Israelites, Judahites, Samaritans, Edomites, Syrians, etc who had undergone varying degrees of Hellenization) tailored to localized experiences of the God expressed through local customs and traditions, local aesthetic preferences, etc. Does this kind of Dionysian androgyny conform to the image we get from the area’s literary and archaeological record? I can think of a couple examples, but mostly you get a very different Dionysos in the Levant.
As Adi Erlich argues in the above article the coroplast could have just had a woopsie moment and put the wrong head on the wrong figurine, but they show up in enough places that it seems to be intentional. So are we sure that they are intentionally representing Dionysos? I know that some of them have what could certainly be considered masculine features in contrast with their prominent breasts, but what if the coroplast was trying to depict a member of Dionysos’ circle who wasn’t young and beautiful; say, his elderly Nurse Nysa? She was, after all, so popular that her grave was located in Beit She’an, which was founded by Dionysos and given two names: the first was Nysa to honor her, and the second was Skythopolis, after a cohort of Skythian archers he left behind to protect the grave when he resumed his march to conquer India.
Most of the evidence for Nysa’s veneration doesn’t come from the site scholars have identified as the probable location of her temple, but from the domestic sphere: frescoes, terracotta statues, niche shrines, coins, and so forth. There’s a lot more I suspect are actually her, but have been identified as other Greek, Egyptian, Canaanite or Hebrew divinities. Likewise I’m not sure that all the images labeled ‘Nysa’ are really Nysa. But that’s neither here nor there.
Unfortunately there’s a lot less uniformity in representations of Nysa than her charge, and next to no myths about her beyond her death and honor guard. (I mean myths unique to the region; other locales had considerably more to say about her.) Which is truly unfortunate, as Dionysos demonstrates a great deal of fondness for her, and anyone he loves is someone I’d like to know more about.
And if these figurines represent a transgender Dionysos that’s pretty cool too.














